Thursday, March 1, 2018

Hon, Wanna Eat Sauteed Grey Alien For Dinner? I Thawed It Out


Medium-high Official Says "We May Not Be Alone" & He's Tip-toeing Around 'Cause 97% Of It Is Classified

In December, 2017 the more-or-less impossible happened and my friends didn't notice:  Someone from the Pentagon,  NY Times reporters, and a retired Navy fighter pilot joined forces, so to speak,
to semi-seriously imply we humans are not alone.   Tucker Carlson of Fox said:  This feels like a huge story to me.  I don't see why Vladimir Putin is more interesting.  Commander Fravor, you seem sober and believable.

The "someone" from the Pentagon is Luis Elizondo, who said, "We may not be alone," on at least one interview.  His facts about program details and cases don't seem to have been contradicted by those inside the Pentagon or other branches of gov.  Elizondo ran a study of Aerial Threats for about 9 years and left last October.  I think it is safe to say this was the first time in US history anyone from the Gov in a position to know ever said to the public, "We may not be alone."  


The "Eastern Establishment Press," starting with NY Times writer Leslie Kean, plus online news source Politico, got wind of a story with these pieces:
        1) Harry Makes A Program.  About 10 years ago Harry Reid of Nevada led the way in putting $22 million over a few years into a quiet multi-disciplinary investigation called Advanced Aerial Threat Identification Program, AATIP.  Reid confirmed the funding and said he is proud of doing it.  Nobody else did this, but I did, he said.  Wonder if he's proud that most of the money went to a company in his own state owned by a UFO believer named Mr Bigelow?  All competitively bid, of course.   
       2) Luis Elizondo.  The Advanced Aerial Threat study was led by Luis Elizondo, ex-Army intelligence guy turned civilian contractor who until October worked in an office "deep in the C-ring of Pentagon," whatever that is.  Had his office been on the edge of the building, it would be less impressive.
       3)  We Found A Lot.  To CNN reporter Burnett asking what they found, Elizondo said a lot.  Many, many sightings in many places of things--call them aircraft--that don't have any obvious flight surfaces, no obvious propulsion systems, plus maneuverability beyond what human body could withstand in changing speeds and directions.  Lots of The Things are shaped like cigars or Tic-Tacs.  Elizondo said "we avoided the rabbit hole of who's behind the wheel and what are their intentions" and looked at what is it and how does it work.  He said they had made serious progress in figuring out the technology, but how they did that when they can't catch Things and what they learned is Classified.   He added, maybe to Glenn Beck, no white Tic-Tacs have been hostile.  Good to know.

       4)  San Diego & Florida Tic-Tacs.  Footage was released from cameras on F-18 planes following 40-foot objects that looked like"flying Tic-Tacs" doing impossible maneuvers with pilots gasping and raving at how the objects seemed to not only be surpassing known aircraft performance but apparently defying the laws of physics for inertia and acceleration.  The Nimitz aircraft carrier group cancelled a practice exercise to send planes out to check on Things, first asking if the fighters had weapons ready.  No, they were carrying dummies.  The carrier told the pilots they had been tracking a small fleet of Things for a week or three.  Luis Elizondo said about 8 pilots got somewhere near the Tic-Tacs.  Pilot Fravor said this group was convinced Things were from space.  Guess you had to be there.

        5)    Stars & Encinitas.  Elizondo recently left Department of Defense (DOD) to join up with a rock star forming a group to study and build some of ET's technologies.  This bunch is based in Encinitas, Cal, near Yogananda's Hindu meditation retreat.  Maybe that's where they will go to kick back and relax, or have hush-hush meetings with Tic-Tac drivers. Maybe you can drive a Tic-Tac after you meditate real deep.

        6)   More Interesting Than Putin.  Tucker Carlson on Fox interviewed F-18 pilot Fravor and  said,  "This feels like a really big story to me.  It's not clear why Vladimir Putin is more interesting than this.  Commander, you seem sober and believable."  Yet the next day I think we can assume Carlson was reporting more on Putin than on the "high strangeness" of poorly explained Things.  Why?  Because you have to be a nutcase, it is commonly known, to think nonEarth tech or beings aren't just crap.  Too bad for pilot Fravor.
        7)  Opposition In Gov To Telling Public Includes Religious Reasons
Elizondo told the Post, "The program had multiple enemies at senior levels of the department, from [those] either skeptical or ideologically opposed to AATIP’s mission."  In an interview with MSNBC TV, Senior Luis went on, "The bureaucracy really limited our ability to keep leadership informed of what we were seeing."  He compared religious objections to studying all this to the Catholic Church naming Galileo a heretic when he got a telescope strong enough to see four moons around Jupiter.  Now we know of over 60 such moons.

         8)    Details of Chasing a Tic-Tac.   David Fraver told Tucker Carlson:  In 2004 we were sent out about 100 miles over the Pacific off San Diego/Ensenada, Mexico.  There were two planes, each manned by two aviators.  Saw a forty-foot-long white Tic-Tac-shaped object hovering above the water, no wings, no rotor wash, nothing.  It was 2000 feet below us.  We fly around clockwise and observe.  It starts to mirror us so it's in a clockwise flow on the opposite side of the circle from us.  We continue this; it's in a climb; we're in a descent.  The whole thing takes about five minutes.  I decide I'm gonna go and see what it is.  As I cut across the circle and get within about half a mile of it, it rapidly accelerates to the south and in about two seconds disappears.  Carlson asks, "What would you estimate the speed?"  "Like a bullet out of a gun, it took off. . . .  Our infrared video showed no exhaust, no visible method of propulsion.  This thing came from just over the water to climb up to 12,000 feet, to gone.  You're talking 50 miles of visibility.  You can easily see an object that size up to ten miles and it just disappeared in seconds."
    If we said ten miles in ten seconds, that's a mile a second.  With 3600 seconds in an hour, that would be 3600 miles an hour.  Satellites orbit the Earth at 17,000 miles an hour, but they don't go from 0 to 3600 in three seconds.
    Carlson asks, "So what do you think this was?"  Fraver says, "I believe, as do the others that were visually on this flight, that it was something not from this world."  "What did your superiors say when you told them that?"  Short answer is they thought we were full of it.  "We caught a lot of grief getting back to the boat and it got passed off as an event no one could explain.  They had been tracking these for two weeks, and this was the first time manned airplanes had been airborne when the objects appeared."

         9)  Exotic materials.   NYTimes wrote of exotic metal alloys Elizondo's program had access to.  He said:  I can't say we've been storing Things in Vegas at the contractor's company, but I'll correct reports of metal alloys to metamaterials with isotopic ratios not found here on Earth.  Elizondo went on to say something uncertain about materials scientists.  Maybe they got part of the $22 mill.  Seems to know fair amount about materials that aren't stored anywhere and were never recovered.
NY Times:  A 2009 Pentagon briefing summary of the program asserted that “what was considered science fiction is now science fact,” and that the United States was incapable of defending itself against some of the technologies discovered.



Mr. Reid said he did not know where the objects had come from. “If anyone says they have the answers now, they’re fooling themselves,” he said. “We do not know.”    Elizondo refers to large amounts of data not disclosed.
Well, hon, if you don't want sauteed, how about braised grey alien for dinner?  I'll turn on the barbeque.

1 comment:

  1. Interesting to say the least. I for one, hope that UFO's of the kind that may one day be IFO's are visiting our planet from way out in the universe. They may have some good advice and may share their tech.
    Re. Exotic Materials: How would the contractor's office have any to examine if the tic tac's flew of at 3600mph after just an innocent face to face with some navy pilots. It makes me want to revisit the carrier group's question about the fighters being weapon ready.
    Another interesting thing: The interviewed pilot said they were "Like a bullet out of a gun, it took off. . . . "
    I recall a story, many years ago (60's or 70's) about a jet fighter being hit by a bullet from its own gun. So, being curious, I decided to read up (a bit) about the speed of bullets vs aircraft. This article https://www.quora.com/Is-a-bullet-faster-than-an-SR-71-Blackbird mentions a bullet from some high powered rifles going up to 3200 feet per second which the author author compares to the speed of a SR-71 Blackbird (2200mph). The math for the bullet 3200ft div by 5280 ft in a mile times 60 seconds per minute times 60 minutes an hour comes out to 2,181mph. 19mph slower than the blackbird. I'm just thinking about all this and following my own curiosity. I just looked up the top speed of an F-18. 1,190mph. I wonder if it would have been possible for the F-18's to shoot down a tic-tac. F-18 going 1190mph shoots a 'high powered gun'. Does the speed of its bullet add to the speed of the F-18? Lets say it would. So now that bullet could go 1190 + 2180 = 3370mph and not able to catch up to the tic tac. So how did the Exotic Materials become available for examination?
    Fun to ponder over. Sorry to make my comment so long. But hey,its feedback on a blog. How many people actually get feedback? I don't. LOL

    ReplyDelete